Clouds, May 2010

Clouds, May 2010
Clouds, May 2010: This picture was taken from the car window on Route 80 in NJ. The lines in the sky are obviously from planes, but the fact that they form an "x" caught my attention. And after I snapped the pic, I noticed the cloud to the left as it looks like a boy's face.

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

new chapter

No doubt members of the fragile x community will look at the title of this post & think it means one thing, when actually I'm updating about another. Just a bizarre coincidence that we are experiencing so many changes in our lives at the moment. For right now I just wanted to share that I am glad I was able to attend at least part of the meet & greet with the incoming LPS Principal this evening. I have only met him briefly, twice, but I think he seems like a good match for the middle school. I also stayed for the beginning of the BOE meeting that followed, & next up the well-deserved recipients of the Governor's Educator of the Year Awards were acknowledged. One of the recipients from the elementary school is someone that we've known since H's first year in this school district. Both recipients from the middle school are familiar to Hayden as well, & one of them actually worked directly with him for the first part of the year. Another tribute that all were looking forward to immediately followed, to honor our recently retired Principal. For anyone who couldn't be there, the Board President's speech was genuinely felt by our former Principal & I believe the room as a whole. His family was there to see him recognized & he was honored with several standing ovations. On a personal note, it's my understanding in the short amount of time that my son knew the principal, they developed quite a bond. I remember when I saw him at the PTA Craft Fair back in the fall, he told me he hardly expected to develop such a relationship with any student this late in his career. The sentiment was better than my recap is, but he essentially said that getting to know my son added much value to his day. He said that Hayden's smile could fill a room with joy & that the love inside of him is an inspiration to others. I am confident other parents of children with special needs would concur, that the mutual positive impact is just incredible when your child is truly understood. Despite the Principal's retirement being somewhat sooner than expected, I wish him happiness & the best of health as he plans ahead. My wish for the incoming Principal is a mutually comfortable relationship with the district moving forward. There are countless kids & so many faculty members who will always have a special place in our hearts, & I know Hayden has a special place in theirs. They all deserve nothing less than the best. --

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

thank you for listening

I could not have imagined that my goal in life would be to facilitate better understanding between my son & the rest of the world. No one would wish for that.

While there are aspects of our life which will always be our business, I generally encourage transparency to help build as much mutual understanding as possible.  

People with fragile x experience a heightened sensitivity to everything around them, among many other challenges. But their senses are affected because they struggle from imbalanced neurological responses to stimuli. There is a term which best describes one of the most severe challenges of fragile x, & it is called hyperarousal. Hyperarousal is the psychological & physiological response to heightened (hyper) anxiety & altered arousal. So in other words Hayden's central nervous system is actually responding to his overwhelment & inability to control what is going on. This is similar to anyone becoming so overwhelmed that they say or do things they don't want to say or do, but in that moment they can not help it even though they know it's happening. This is multiplied many times over for a person with fragile x syndrome, because they are constantly battling their own biology just to respond to the world around them.    

Hayden is completely aware when he gets overwhelmed & he certainly does not want to feel that way, but biologically his nervous system lacks regulation. He might not even be able to follow through with the motor planning of simply walking away from a situation himself. And he gets so “stuck”, in every sense of the word, that it's also unlikely for him to appropriately communicate that he wants to be left alone. So the pressure of the situation is only going to further trigger his reaction. Because truthfully, what he really wants in these moments is for everyone’s attention to be diverted elsewhere. 

If you take all of that, & add in the basic difficulties that any person on the verge of their teenage years will start to experience, it's nothing short of a challenging recipe. But as a parent you do your best to help your kid do their best. And you're one of the lucky ones if your efforts are truly reciprocated by other people in your child's life. 

​​​​​Tonight, for the first time in longer than I can remember, my son went to bed early. I pray he sleeps well & finally gets a good night's rest. His schedule has been quite thrown with winter recess being unexpectedly flanked by even more time off school. As we work through all of this our friends & family continue to be the reasons we're still standing.

At last night's BOE meeting Dan & I had a brief opportunity to meet an incoming Principal. When I introduced him to my sister I said something about her coming all the way from NY to support us (again), & that you can't tell by looking at her but she wears a cape. I will also add the only reason one of my parents weren't standing beside us as well, is because they were entertaining the King. But I lost count of how many times they came to our rescue in the past couple months-- my mother joked at this point it would have been easier to just own property by us. 

I wouldn't wish this struggle on anyone but everyone should be so lucky to have this kind of support.

I was also encouraged to ask for an opportunity to speak to the Board. Long story short I never had a plan to do so on-the-spot last night... but they graciously accepted. So following the public session, my sister & Dan & I actually sat before them in a private meeting so I could voice our concerns. While I had no planned speech and nothing written down, & there were moments when my emotions took over, thankfully (to say the least) Dan or Jenna carried the points through. And the fact is-- excluding the minute or so that I covered my face with my scarf-- my little bit of bravery was met with a lot of heart. It was already late yet the Board stayed to listen without any advance notice, & for that we are incredibly grateful. 

As I said I could not have imagined that my goal in life would be to facilitate better understanding between my son & the rest of the world, but it's crucial because Hayden deserves much more than two sides agreeing to disagree. And the only thing more important than helping the world to better understand Hayden, is to first make sure that he is happy.

I'm relieved Hayden isn't aware of all the advocating we need to continue to do. But I hope he does know that even when he's only able to communicate through a behavior, we hear him. We managed to get everything he needed in order to progress in the past, & one way or another we're going to get it all together again. But in the interim we are further strengthened with so much support from family, friends, & members of the community. Please know that is doing something. While working towards developing a solution, it is truly a relief to simply be heard.  


Wednesday, December 21, 2016

Information for Parents of Students with ADHD or Similar Behaviors

Just sharing information about an agenda item from the BOE meeting, under the Child Study Team Report...

This section was not read aloud & I also believe most parents probably overlooked it not understanding the context of some of the bullet points.

One in particular I want to help other parents understand, as it may apply to their child one day: 

"A new procedure was put in place regarding doctor assessment forms such as the Vanderbilt, and the Connor's Rating Scales. Parents are no longer to receive these forms regarding the students. These forms will be sent directly to the doctor and a copy will be placed in their file. This is to prevent any backlash from parents towards teachers. This also will increase the accuracy of the data shared with the doctors. Since the purpose of this documentation is to help the doctor with diagnoses, etc, and not to update parents regarding progress, it is felt that this is best practice."

So... forms such as the Vanderbilt Assessment Scale & the Conners Comprehensive Behavior Rating Scale are both well known, & frequently used to provide an overview of very common challenges in children. They can be downloaded off the web & they are intended to be submitted to doctors.

The Vanderbilt is used to help healthcare professionals diagnose ADHD in children. Post-diagnosis, they are used to track (for example) treatment plan progress. There is a Teacher-Informant version & a Parent-Informant version. 

The Conners is designed to provide a complete overview of various child & adolescent concerns & disorders. Psychologists can use the Conners to assess a wide spectrum of behaviors, emotions, academic & social problems in children. 

Approximately a month or so ago this new change in process, of not allowing the parents a copy, was put in place & communicated via a memo from the administration to the faculty. BOE review & approval of this procedure allows this process, described as best practice, to become official policy. 

Parents may feel unsettled that there could ever be an assessment about their kid that they would not be allowed to see. One issue is that technically such a policy could not prevent a parent from displaying backlash towards teachers, anyway. Parents could do this in response to report cards, grades, or anything whatsoever. I don't recommend behaving that way, but a policy against a parental right to see an assessment is not going to stop backlash from happening. This was something I already communicated my opinion about in a letter to the Board. 

Furthermore, it is inaccurate to say that skipping over the parent would increase the accuracy of the data on the assessment... for a couple of reasons. First, the parent is going to ultimately see the assessment anyway because they will get a copy of it from their child's doctor. And furthermore, to that point, this policy can cause delay in the parent's access to this information (which is, in part, a violation of the law which I'll get to later). Second, if a parent is getting a copy of the assessment from the school there is no opportunity to manipulate the data, because the school would be forwarding the original copy of assessment to the healthcare provider. 

My suggestion, which I also shared in the letter to the BOE, would be to change the parental consent form... because parents have to give the school permission for them to even be able to give this information to their child's doctor. So in my opinion the consent should have some sort of legal verbiage added on there stating (for example) that the school is not held responsible for the integrity of any data that the parent provides to the healthcare provider. Or however an attorney may see fit... but there must be a way to protect the information (& the reputation of the source, so-to-speak) without violating the rights of the parents. 

About the law, specifically... under the NJ State Education Code parents are permitted to inspect & review the contents of the student's records, maintained by the district, without any unnecessary delay.

Furthermore, per the official Parental Rights in the Special Education Code, the public school maintaining the child's educational records must assume the parents have the authority (again) to inspect & review their child's records, unless the school has been legally notified in writing that a parent's rights have been terminated under state law. Rights include: seeing a list of all records, where they're kept, the right to explanation of the records, ability to obtain copies, notification before any information is destroyed, as well as parental consent (or refusal) to share their child's records (without educational or legal purpose in seeing them). Also noteworthy, according to the Code, the school must keep a record of persons obtaining access to the records. And the parents have a right to this information including name, date, & how the record was used.

All of the above information can be found online. But long story short, these are voluntary assessments that a parent may ask the school teacher(s) to provide, & as written the new policy subsequently prevents parents from being able to see these assessments.

And last but certainly not least... this policy is a violation of The Family Educational Rights & Privacy Act, more commonly known as FERPA law. 

Although I spoke very briefly to this agenda item, the fact is going into this BOE meeting the majority of my efforts were focused elsewhere. My goal in sharing this is to keep others informed & encourage anyone in disagreement with the new policy to appropriately voice their concern at any time. 


Wednesday, November 23, 2016


This month marks a milestone that I knew nothing about for the first seventeen months of parenthood. Ten years ago in November of 2006, our expectations would be changed forever & a diagnosis meant our lives would never be the same. 

I do (but don't) wish I had a picture of the script that the pediatric neurologist wrote, which was filled from edge-to-edge with the names & codes for the number of different tests that the lab would need to run with my child's blood samples. We all knew Hayden had global developmental delays but none of us knew why. 

Everything from that year ended up in a binder-- assessments, evaluations, appointment notes, & so forth. Out of curiosity I recently flipped through it to count how many different clinic, hospital, or other logos I could find on the various letterhead. Post-diagnosis, there were more than twenty in the first year alone. 

I am not thankful for the fragile x gene itself, & what that means for us on a day-to-day (or sometimes hour-to-hour) basis. I am not thankful for what this gene means for my son & his quality of life which unbeknownst to us was compromised before he even opened his eyes for the very first time. And for those who have walked in similar shoes you will understand when I say I didn't want to be welcomed to Holland in any sort of figurative sense & the tulips are not going to make it better. I still go through small phases of mourning & I know I always will.

I am not thankful for fragile x syndrome because I know how aware Hayden is of the growing developmental gap between himself & his peers. I hate that this gene mutation forces his toughest moments to be on display for everyone to witness, because the biology of what is going on inside his body is stronger than his ability to fight it. The absolute worst behaviors steal the very best of him & this breaks my heart, because he is actually one of the strongest people I know. His strength is evident in his accomplishments, the genuineness of his smile & the tenacity in his eyes. So no, I am not thankful for fragile x interfering with that.

But I will say something else. After a decade of all this sinking in, & some hefty doses of reality that I am not always thankful for, we have also had some strong doses of gratitude along the way. Ten years, ten examples:

Many who have worked directly with Hayden at some point or another, are truly second to none. In a world where there are way more patients than there are providers, & the number of retiring experts is rarely met by adequate graduates to fill their shoes... somehow we have been paired with a number of people who are worth their weight in gold.

Often these incredible people who have been a part of Hayden's program in the past by assignment, also remain a part of his life moving forward. By choice.

And speaking of moving forward, it feels really good having a truly incredible charity to rally around.

Especially such a foundation that turns opportunity into empowerment by offering mutual support annually. 

Speaking of advocacy & all the other necessary roles which define parenting a child with special needs... it's not the worst thing in the world to discover you're really good at something. Even more so at a time in your life when you certainly did not anticipate such profound learning.

And despite the moments when you want to sit in a corner & sob, deep down you know you kick ass when it counts.

It's not about the lab results, even though a diagnosis is responsible for introducing most of us. It's the unparalleled community dedication that holds everyone together.

The opportunity to build strength out of something that is literally labeled fragile.

We don't overlook anything. Detail oriented? Yes. (You have no idea.) But what I really mean is that we inevitably appreciate successes more than we possibly could have if our child didn't have to work so tirelessly. I know what it's like to damn near burst with pride over each achievement & the feeling is indescribable.
And the very best dose of gratitude... the select ones (outside of the fragile x community) who DO see your kid the way you do. They respect him with all of his differences. They admire him for his determination. And they're grateful Hayden is a part of their life. But most importantly they make sure he is a part of their life

I am not thankful for fragile x but that gene will never have enough power to break my gratitude when & where it counts. 


Saturday, November 12, 2016

accounting for awareness

I saw The Accountant Movie which I heard fragile x was mentioned in. Now that I've seen it out of curiosity I also wanted to look up more information. Came across a few interviews which are quite interesting, especially Ben Affleck's research to play a character who is on the autism spectrum-- albeit very high functioning*. Since autism is a spectrum disorder there are many people who are much more cognitively impacted than others. Another side note, in the movie (& elsewhere) *this form of autism is referred to as Asperger's. Currently the medical community is continuing to shy away from that label, & instead using a level 1 diagnosis on the autism spectrum. 

The mention of fragile x in the film is during a phone conversation which I would guesstimate is at least half way through the movie. No major spoiler alerts here at all, so don't worry...
But there is a woman in the story who works for the government in a technical capacity as an analyst, & one of her superiors ultimately coerces her to investigate this accountant. Among the evidence is an audio file which is dissected & examined for clues, & she ultimately uncovers a barely detectable fraction of a segment when you can hear a man verbally stimming. Although her character does not realize what it is, this does stand out so she pursues learning more.

Just to offer a bit of information, though-- speech stimming is different than perseveration because the latter is more accurately defined as continuing to utter something, even after the stimuli which prompted it is no longer there. Whereas stimming is the self-regulating repetition. When the woman in the movie is on the phone & asks about that particular sound clip, the person she is speaking to explains that it is stimming. He says this type of stimming is speech repetition with maintained intonation, & is most common in people with conditions such as fragile x syndrome or autism. She then says something to the effect of... how can you tell... & the man on the phone says that with fragile x there is often an elongated face, enlarged ears... whereas autism can be nearly undetectable. (Not that exact wording but that's essentially what they were saying.)

One thing I would like to clarify is that although there are many people with fragile x syndrome who do have some distinguishing physical characteristics, there are also many who do not. These are among the reasons why fragile x syndrome & autism are often referred to as hidden disabilities. As far as individuals with fragile x who do have some of these traits, there are many who have these attributes from birth & then some who develop them much later during puberty. But again, not everyone will have an obvious outward appearance.

A more accurate discrepancy in the specific context of this movie would have been the intellectual component. So in the movie as fragile x & autism came up when she was investigating the accountant, you would not default to autism because of the lack of physical characteristics. But rather the level of such high functioning that the accountant has could definitely be consistent with someone who is also on the autism spectrum.

I don't know that people would walk away from the movie even remembering that fragile x syndrome was the name of the other condition the man on the phone mentions. And if by chance they did, it is highly unlikely that more than a few might take it a step further to research. But since the awareness is out there I would still consider that a good thing.

There are a number of very difficult scenes in the movie but one seemingly less significant moment that got to me the most, was during one of the many flashbacks to the childhood of Ben Affleck's character. I can't specify the context of the scene because that would be a spoiler alert. But what's going on is that due to the environmental circumstances making the child feel unable to cope, he is spiraling out of control. The father stands behind his son & puts his arms around him-- with much difficulty as the child is thrashing & resisting-- but you literally witness how he also begins to return to a centered state of mind. The input that the father is giving his son is called proprioceptive (pro-pree-o-sep-tiv). One of the easier definitions of this is relating to stimuli connected with the position & movement of the body. Proprioception refers to overall body awareness, so the proprioceptive input is effectively helping the brain regain control of the body.

This was heartbreaking for me to watch because I understand too well how easy it is for the child's reaction to be completely misinterpreted  by the outside world-- & not at all understood as the involuntary neurological response that it is. And furthermore how difficult it can be for the father to be able to give him this input, let alone without anyone getting injured. For at least a couple of years now Hayden has been getting too tall & too strong for me to safely assist him in that way. But watching that unfold on an enormous screen for everyone to see... it's exactly what Dan has had to do countless times, & I felt completely empathetic to what was happening.

This is not an educational movie by any stretch of the imagination, but there are a number of scenes which prove someone did their homework (& other scenes that were quite worrisome). But since it is so uncommon for fragile x to have the spotlight, it was positive to see those couple minutes of awareness on the big screen.

While the advocate in me wants to stand at the exit after every showing with brochures, more realistically I just hope people check it out!

For more information about fragile x syndrome as well as fragile x- associated disorders, &/or the connection between fx & autism, please visit The National Fragile X Foundation via any of those links.  


Wednesday, November 9, 2016

please rise

When Hayden said good morning to me I said it back with a smile.
I am not a morning person (at all) & I also voted for Hillary Clinton. But the only thing that Hayden knows is that it's Wednesday morning & he was happy to get ready for school. 

But while I was cooking his breakfast my mind was still absorbing the shock of this new reality. I know the country & the world is somewhat dumbfounded but I started to smirk. Because in the wee hours of the morning (last night) the first bad joke that came to mind-- after I realized that Donald Trump was likely to win the majority electoral votes-- was I don't think Michelle Obama's remark was meant to be a prediction when she said, 'When they go low, we go high'... yet here we are & they've gone about as low as they can go, & after the end of this election, many more Americans can get high.

Then I thought to myself what is the best case scenario here? That something happens to him before or shortly after he is sworn into office? Not really because logistically that would make things worse. But I thought of the wall he used to talk about. And next thing I know I have this image of him sitting on top of it & in my mind I am reciting, "Trumpty Dumpty sat on a wall..." 
You know what comes next. 

Listen. There is no shame in feeling overwhelmed with grief, crying it out, dusting yourself off, & standing back up again. That is a healthy response to mourning. Personally, I am choosing not to be upset because I am proud that the most qualified candidate in history ultimately won the popular vote. I am proud I did not vote based on bogus sites pretending to publish factual news. I maintained maturity & I was not influenced by internet memes. But most importantly, I am proud I did not succumb to fear rhetoric. 

If our next President struggles to succeed, I will not point my finger at Trump supporters the way they have tried to demean my beliefs. If our next President succeeds in making appropriate decisions for the United States of America, I will enjoy a tremendous sense of relief. (Especially because this is someone who has managed to divide his own political party in a way this country has never seen.)

Either way I vow to accept this outcome with dignity & pride & perhaps, dare I say, in a manner that the opposition may have never mirrored. No one can change the fact that history was still made-- it has not been put on hold & Hillary Clinton has impacted that glass ceiling so it is far more frail than ever before. 

But I personally did not vote based on gender. I voted for the candidate who wants to continue to expand opportunities for Americans with disabilities. The candidate who also wants to support the millions of Americans living with autism. I voted for the candidate who wants to put an end to Alzheimer's within the next ten years. I voted for the candidate who believes that the wealthiest ought to pay their fair share in taxes. I voted for the candidate who believes that all Americans deserve to live their lives free from discrimination. The candidate who believes that we need to build an economy that works for everyone. I voted for the candidate who does believe as a nation we must fully commit to supporting our veterans. The candidate who said it is not enough to contain ISIS-- we must defeat terrorism altogether. 

America's overall decision was a noteworthy narrow margin which can not be argued or ignored. We must keep looking up & be in control of the fact that this is not defeat. This is motivation.

Let us consider the top major cities people think of in the United States: 
New York... Los Angeles... Washington... Miami... Philadelphia.
Clinton won them all. Including the entire NY/NJ/CT tri-state area on the east coast, & the whopping 55 electoral votes on the opposite coast in California. Different coasts with majority support for the same person. That's a bridge approximately 2500 miles long & that is a vision of success. 

I believe we will make it through the next four years & America will see very clearly in 2020. We will be the re-United States that I remain proud to call my home. 


Saturday, October 8, 2016

Red, Blue, & You

[Note: this post has been updated to remain current.]

My political opinion is that we should all have one. Americans who are eligible to vote need to exercise their right to do so. Even in our current, unconventional (to say the least) political climate, I still find it inexcusable that we live in a country where a percentage of the citizens actually need to be encouraged to vote.

On that note I envy anyone wholly supports the candidate of their choice. At this point most Americans seem to be standing beside the person who they despise the least. So you are lucky-- in all seriousness-- if you truly admire either presidential candidate with pure, all-around respect. Many people feel they are compromising some of their own personal beliefs & principals, in one way or another, by casting their vote for the lesser of two evils. (Although, at least they're voting.) I am writing this as if there is only a choice of one or the other, because that is most realistic at this time.

We will have differing views & this is to be expected. In fact on some level it is a relief... otherwise we would most definitely be missing a perspective of crucial importance. And as a parent of a child with special needs I of course have my own perspective.

In my opinion Trump is successful in identifying issues which he believes are most prevalent. He is also quite clear communicating his positions. At the same time I am listening to him but I am not fully understanding, logistically, how he plans to achieve most of these goals. As a voter I do not want to hear what is going to be great, I want to hear how.

My perception of Trump is someone who appears completely annoyed by the entire political process. Not only is there footage of him over the course of many decades admitting that while he feels this country needs better, he wouldn't want to be that person... he actually commented near the beginning of the last debate to the same point. In reference to his own involvement in politics over the last year & a half or so-- he said he can't believe it. Not in the context of having a sense of pride... but rather a tone of disbelief. It was a quick, off-the-cuff comment but he said so. Mr. Trump has been labeled honest & someone who never pretends to be someone he's not (this is actual verbiage borrowed from his latest defense related to the recently surfaced lewd talk, which he said was nothing more than harmless "locker room banter")*. I do not disagree that he tells it like it is. I am only further convinced that Trump is a man who does not even want to be in politics. (*P.S. Mr. Trump was working when he said that. He was on an NBC lot for a guest appearance on Days of our Lives.)

And the only thing I will say with regard to those viral posts about the hypocrisy of people who enjoyed 50 Shades while finding Trump's leaked comment appalling, is this: 50 Shades is a fictional series for entertainment purposes about two consenting adults. End of story. Walking up to someone & groping them in the crotch is the opposite of consent. Are these women letting you do whatever you want, Mr. Trump? Or they didn't have a second to stop you because you just moved right in? Furthermore it is simply inaccurate to compare Trump's consistent behavior with people who like hip hop music. What are some of the nastiest songs you can think of? LL Cool J's Doin' It? Does this woman look or sound like she is not consenting? What about rock music? Ever listen to Nickelback? Some of his songs are nothing short of racy, indecent, or shock-worthy. Yet they are not about forcing sexual contact on a woman. (If your next thought is Bill Clinton, don't worry-- I get to that point, too, about ten paragraphs ahead.)

I am reading the posts of Trump supporters, their articles, their comments & even their jokes. I can't stop anyone from theorizing that Hillary Clinton's public persona is different from her private persona. But what I do see is that many of these people are primarily angered by their perception of the media unfairly bashing Trump, & therefore they are on the defensive. Perhaps they feel like they're being noble by upholding their team loyalty, so-to-speak & that is okay. Even though this is a presidency we're talking about & not a sports team, still, on some level I can respect that.

However, I do not believe Trump even wants to be President except to say he made it happen. I understand voting based on the belief that Trump is a smart businessman and he would surround himself with the right team. I do not agree with it, but I understand that perspective (except for the voters who seem to be choosing based on their hate for Obama, but again, they are planning to vote so that is a start).

I am primarily hearing that Hillary Clinton is weak and/or unfair on issues regarding gun control, immigration, & support for our veterans. Her position on gun control is that you can legally own firearms. The exceptions are people who have been found guilty of domestic abuse, or found guilty of intentionally buying a gun for someone prohibited from owning one. She also supports strengthening the background checks on gun sales. For example, prohibiting purchases by any person on the TSA No-Fly List. So let's get to the topic of immigration next. Hillary will focus resources on detaining & deporting individuals who pose a violent threat to public safety. To that point her position on national security also includes preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, utilizing her experience with Russia, China, & many leaders around the world to stand our ground, & implementing a real & comprehensive plan to dismantle global terror networks & defeat ISIS. And finally, she does believe the United States veterans deserve a fundamentally reformed plan to access quality care for their health. She also wants to empower them to apply their unique skills towards jobs, while backing military spouses & their children. I am just offering a single paragraph summary here, but you can visit her site yourself to be further educated.

I will never vote one way or another because a whole bunch of celebrities said so. And just because I am a registered Democrat I will not be stopped from voting Republican. I'm prepared to vote in any election based on the person not the party. While the overwhelming comparisons of Trump to Hitler frighten me-- & if they don't frighten you then I'm even more worried-- I do have more than one focus of importance.

First, I refuse to support someone who "honestly" does not even want the job. And do not misunderstand-- because he does want the title of President. However, he genuinely has ZERO interest with the distinguished task of actually following through with the role of Commander in Chief. The only thing he wants out of this nation is popularity. For Trump this is the ultimate challenge. If you are listening to what he is saying in any one of his speeches, he is not even trying to hide it because his talking points always come back to "stamina" & "winning". This is also the one trait, which we learned at the end of the last debate, he actually respects Hillary Clinton for... because she does not give up. But the primary difference being she is in her element so much so, that she has been labeled the most qualified presidential candidate in history.

Second, I have spent time browsing & reading the sites for each candidate. In this era this is supposed to be our go-to on the issues. Trump, as you know, has two sites-- you can visit & go to his "Positions" tab to read about his views. Or you can visit & you will see information on his country clubs, hotels, & wineries. I am confused & unsettled how he would be able to maintain his dedication to both. But again, this man could be our next President. So I have been digging to find something to make me feel more comfortable with this idea.

Which brings me to the third & final detail driving my personal decision. My own son is the child of an interfaith home with parents who (generally) have opposing political views. But the detail of utmost importance is the fact that our son was born with fragile x syndrome (fxs). Although Hayden's condition is genetic, at any given time everyone in the world could be one moment away from having a disability due to accident, illness, violence, or any number of circumstances. Fxs affects Hayden's neurological & muscular development. He just started middle school & he has already been a target of ill-natured "banter" as a result of having fxs.

So again, I have been reading & watching & absorbing more information than in any other election I have ever voted in. I have friends, family, & loved ones who are 100% Trump supporters-- not many, but a small handful of people who I would consider close. I am trying to understand their perspectives as much as I am trying to understand Trump's. As a caregiver of a child with special needs I was unable to find what I wanted on his site for candidacy, so I simply looked up "Trump policies on Americans with disabilities". As of the first week in October, the top results are articles that do not paint a very reassuring picture of him. The search also yielded a few results related to Social Security Disability Insurance.
But within the top five, there was also this:

I then called the phone number on Trump's site for candidacy & they said they're pretty much just a donation line & they could not answer questions. I said it's very simple-- under the "Positions" section of his site, I could not find any information related to people with special needs. The person I spoke with said I should email info@donaldjtrump... so I did. My message contained one, short simple question with a precise subject header. I have yet to receive a reply but if I do I will update this. (And speaking of emails...)

Last year when I first thought about the possible reality of Mr. Trump having the privilege of calling the White House his home I felt surprisingly unsettled to say the least. And I know those who oppose Hillary are already thinking about former President Clinton's past but this does not convince me that she is wrong for the presidency. Nor does the fact that her husband paid a settlement to resolve a lawsuit, under which he was never found guilty. If I were the accuser I can not imagine I would ever let him get away with that.  Anti-Hillary voters are also forced to use words like "alleged" & "suspicious" because otherwise their statements about the Clinton family would not be accurate. Those words mean "without proof" & "questionable". We do not have to question who & what Trump stands for, because his behavior shows us proof all of the time. 

In their own words, here is part of the mission of The Federal Bureau of Investigation of the United States of America:

"Our priority is to help protect you, your children, your communities, and your businesses from the most dangerous threats facing our nation—from international and domestic terrorists to spies on U.S. soil, from cyber villains to corrupt government officials, from mobsters to violent street gangs, from child predators to serial killers. Along the way, we help defend and uphold our nation’s economy, physical and electronic infrastructure, and democracy."

The same FBI found that Hillary Clinton was careless but not criminal. There are people who disagree & some of them express their opinions through absurd memes. But at the end of the day I will respect the candidate who has the ability to apologize without struggling through those words, & without consistently attempting to bring someone else down or redirect attention. I will also respect the person who can ultimately focus on the issues instead of the insults, & who will listen before they speak.  And last but not least, I respect any human being who understands the importance of women being trusted to make their own decisions about their own bodies, & having access to SAFE healthcare.

The tone at Trump's rallies... it's terrifying.... he brings out the worst in people. Again and again. I never heard Trump make a statement about encouraging his followers to support him in a more productive way. Not even close. As a matter of fact, he has spoken about how protesters ought to be carried out on a stretcher "like the old days", when you could punch them. And his behavior is not much better whether he's at a rally or a debate. Speaking of the most recent debate, I do not know how to respect a person who forms the letter "L" with their pointer finger & thumb, to communicate "loser", while their opponent is speaking. Of course some people say he was just trying to signal "one minute", but unfortunately there were plenty of moments when his communication was perfectly clear. Such as publicly threatening a fellow presidential candidate, & worse, on the stage of an official debate. (I am calling it a threat but that's being light, because it was more of a promise.) Trump supporters say he is just being Honest Trump & he is not HiLIARy... Hellary... whatever.  If you want to vote based on creative name-calling then keep watching Faux News. Debates are a platform to help Americans make informed decisions. It is beyond shameful to treat this venue as a soap opera. If Hillary Clinton organized a panel before the debate with four men who have allegations against Melania, & then invited these guys to sit up front during the debate, the person I would be most humiliated for is Hillary. I'm almost surprised that Trump didn't ask those four women to show up in blue dresses-- I mean it's not as if anything is out of bounds for him.

I also do not understand that 2008 clip of Michelle Obama supposedly attacking Hillary, specifically, when she said something to the effect of... if you can't run your own house you have no business running The White House. Let's just for a moment put aside the fact that she currently endorses Hillary 100%. If you look at the much broader scheme of things, damn straight Hillary is the one wearing the pants in her house.

One thing we can all agree on: for each eyebrow-raising action of one candidate, we could probably dig up something about the other.  But let us be serious: Trump supporters are furious that Clinton supporters are supposedly more concerned over some nasty language, than they are about national security. Putting aside this shallow observation-- & I mean that literally, as in lacking depth-- it is important to realize what comes next if Trump were elected. With everything else in the universe that we all have to worry about, do we want to add to the top of that list a person who speaks defensively, with little filter, & even less self-restraint? I hope everyone takes a moment to think about that because this man, with his overly reactive voice, will be representing all of us. We will run the risk of our beloved country being turned into a land mocked by the rest of the world. He is a reality TV star that has gone too far. So I ask you how can that reality make anyone in our nation feel more safe & secure?

While it is obvious I do not respect the way that Donald Trump has carried himself throughout this election, & even though substantial evidence of his words & actions do reinforce rape culture, (I can't believe I am saying this but) the fact is if I truly believed he is the best option for our country right now then I would simply vote for him. But these stories that are coming out about him-- you know stories, plural-- are not isolated incidents.

What I do believe is that everyone must stop & take a moment & think about our nation's capitol. The history of the White House building. Think far beyond all the presidents who have occupied this historic structure... & think beyond the actual construction (& then reconstruction) of its walls & corridors... where countless leaders and dignitaries have stepped foot. The White House is not just the home of the President of the United States... (as stated on this is a museum of American history. One of the single most important buildings on American soil would simply look foolish if it were occupied by a person whose name is synonymous with a gold tower. Or worse. 

If Trump is ever in control of the White House make no mistake this means he will essentially be in control of your home, too. The other fact you must admit to yourself is that this breathtakingly beautiful, iconic building at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue would absolutely be nothing more than a trophy to a man like Donald Trump. This may be how he views his wife but that's his choice. The vote for presidency, however, is up to all of us.

Remember, no one will be in the booth with you when you're casting your vote. We live in a democracy & it is never okay to jeopardize that.